Top three blogs

English blogs

Multilingual

Umno, BN

Techs, guide, templates

MPs and Aduns

Latest from Beras Terpilih

News blogs

2008 list

Videos and Photos

Videos courtesy of Hanief
Showing posts with label Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Police. Show all posts

Saturday, December 25, 2010

Beaten and robbed by cops over expired road tax

For being frank with the police, 34-year-old Chia Buang Hing was detained for five days and beaten up until he vomited blood.

The businessman, who is frame-maker, narrated the "horrific" incident today, saying that the police bashed him up, threatened and robbed him of RM13,000 in cash he was carrying - all for the expired road tax of his wife's car that he was driving.

Chia's nightmare began about 11pm on Dec 18, as he was driving from his house in Tropicana to Kota Damansara, where traffic police had set up roadblocks.

Having spotted the expired road tax, one of the police officers asked for his driver's licence and identification card.

It was then, he said, that the officer spotted stacks of RM50 notes, totalling RM7,000, sticking out of his pocket and demanded that he hand them over (more at Malaysiakini 24/12/10).

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Bullyboys on rampage again

Malaysia-Today.Net
And Proud of it! (Courtesy of Mob1900)



From Rocky:
Spoke to RPK. He's at home. They confiscated his desktop and laptop. And he has been summoned to Bukit Aman (CCID, near the Bank Negara NOT the one near the old British Council, just in case you want to turn up and show your support) to give a statement.

Update by Rocky (7.30 pm):

RPK, who runs the Malaysia Today on-line, said the Commercial Crime Division of Bukit Aman had asked him to make a statement with regards to his posting headlined "Let's send Altantuya murderers to Hell".

He refused to make that statement, of course.

The cops gave up (for now, at least) after two hours.

RPK was accompanied by his lawyer, YB William Leong, the MP of Selayang.

Scores of journalists, bloggers and Malaysia Today supporters waited at the entrance of the Bukit Aman.

The MP of Wangsa Maju, YB Wee Choo Keong, arrived just after 5pm. After a brief discussion with Marina, RPK's wife, Wee told her he would try and meet the cops. He asked me to accompany him. Wee took offence when the sentry on duty stepped in front of him and blocked his progress with an elbow.

"Wah, is this a police state now? I don't think we are a police state. Are we a police state?" Wee challenged the sentry's superiors. He said the sentry treated him like a criminal.

"If you can do this to an wakil rakyat," he continued, "what chance does the average citizen," he said, pointing at me, "your guard there will kick him out, hah?"

That's YB Wee for you!

Raja Petra said the cops still had his lap top and computer. He confirmed that he was being investigated under Sedition Act.

"For two hours they tried to make me make a statement. I refused. They threatened to charge me for refusing to make a statement. I told them, go ahead and arrest me or release me right now. And i told them that if they let me walk, I don't want to see their faces again."

Go to www.myblog-tv.com for our own Yew-Tube.
From a former victim (and still a victim actually), Nat:
There are unconfirmed reports via KeADILan’s sms service that RPK’s house was searched by the police and his computers confiscated (these dumbos never seem to get the point with the computer confiscation), over articles concerning Najib and Altantuya.
Susan Loone says:
Keep close watch. Keep your fingers cross. For those who pray, pray for Raja Petra.

We are with you.

Police call in Raja Petra for questioning (Malaysiakini 2/5/08)

Cops investigating Raja Petra under Multimedia Act
The Star (2/5/08): Malaysia Today editor Raja Petra Kamaruddin is being investigated under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and Section 4C of the Seditious Act for an article he wrote recently titled Let's send the Altantuya murderers to hell.

It is learnt that eight police officers from the Federal Commercial Crimes Investigations Department (CCID) visited Raja Petra’s house in Sungai Buloh here at about 9am on Friday.

They seized a laptop and a CPU (central processing unit) before leaving at about 11am.

Raja Petra was summoned to the Federal Commercial Crimes Investigations Department (CCID) department at 4pm Friday after initially being told to report there at 11am Saturday.

He was allowed to leave at about 6pm after he refused to give a statement on the article he wrote and posted on the Malaysia Today online news portal on April 25.

His lawyer William Leong, who is also the Selayang MP, accompanied him.

More than 20 people including his wife and Wangsa Maju MP Wee Choo Keong, who was disallowed entry into the CCID building to see Raja Petra, waited outside the building and cheered when he walked out.

Speaking to reporters outside the department building, Raja Petra said that he was summoned to the department to give a statement under Section 4C of the Seditious Act for the article that he wrote in his blog on murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu.

He said that the police officers were trying to persuade him for two hours to give a statement on the article.

"They told me that they wanted to take down my statement but I told them that I refuse to answer any questions or for my statement to be taken.

"I also told them that this is the fourth time they are calling me to give a statement under the Seditious Act where the first one was in 2001, the second in November 2004, the third when (Rural and Regional Development Minister Tan Sri Muhammad) Muhammad Taib lodged a police report at the Dang Wangi police station in 2007 and this is the fourth time," he said.

Raja Petra claimed that the police told him that they would arrest him if he refused to give a statement as they were supposed to question him under Section 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

When asked why he had refused to give a statement, Raja Petra replied, "Because this is political prosecution. I refuse to play their political game.''

He also said that the police officers had refused to reveal the name of the person who had lodged a report against him.

"They only told me that it was a police officer,'' he said.

When questioned whether he would need to be present at the CCID department at 11am Saturday, based on a notice served by the police officers who had gone to his house Friday, Raja Petra replied, ''I don't know. Maybe they will charge me for refusing to make a statement and arrest me,'' he said, adding that the laptop and CPU which were taken away by police officers earlier Friday were not returned to him.

Under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998:

1) A person who

a) by means of any network facilities or network service or applications service knowingly —

(i) makes, creates or solicits; and

(ii) initiates the transmission of,

any comment, request, suggestion or other communication which is obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive in character with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person; or

b) initiates a communication using any applications service, whether continuously, repeatedly or otherwise, during which communication may or may not ensue, with or without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass any person at any number or electronic address,

commits an offence.

2) A person who knowingly

(a) by means of a network service or applications service provides any obscene communication for commercial purposes to any person; or

(b) permits a network service or applications service under the person 's control to be used for an activity described in paragraph (a),

commits an offence.

(3) A person who commits an offence under this section shall, on conviction,be liable to a fine not exceeding fifty thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or to both and shall also be liable to a further fine of one thousand ringgit for every day during which the offence is continued after conviction
Police questioned Raja Petra over Altantuya article
NST (2/5/08): Blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin was questioned this morning by the Federal Commercial Crime Cyber Crime Unit for an article he posted in his blog that referred to the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder. A seven-men team led by Deputy Superintendent Victor Sanjos spent two hours at Raja Petra’s home- cum-office in Bukit Rahman Putra in Sungai Buloh at 9am.

He also went to Bukit Aman at 4pm after he was ordered to do so.

When contacted, Raja Petra, 58, said he was being investigated under the Sedition Act 1948 for an article titled “Let’s send the Altantuya murderers to hell” that was posted on his blog website www.malaysia-today.net on April 25.

In the article, were listed allegations quoting names of people as well as events that took place prior to Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu murder. “The police officers questioned me and later took my laptop and my personal computer,” he said.

This was the fourth time that he was investigated by police under the same Act. The first was in March 2001 followed by November 2004 and in July last year.
it is understood that police are investigating Raja Petra under the Communications and Multimedia Act.

Those found guilty under Section 233 may be be liable to a fine up to RM50,000, maximum jail sentence of one year or to both.
Walk with RPK!! Let's send Altantuya murderers to hell!

Friday, January 11, 2008

Muharram ghost tour

Ahirudin Attan said, "Not a good start for Muharram, not at all".

Who could deny that? Not only another girl has gone missing while the police are still at loss for clues about Nurin's abductor and murderer, but we are also haunted by list of other "ghosts".

"Oil for food" fake shortage, crime rate spiking up (Umno politicians included?), endless scandals in the police force (polis raja di Malaysia or Polis Diraja Malaysia?) and now sundry shops finding it hard to obtain flour. The list will go on and on.

As usual, a great length of all the factors listed by a few smart Alexs to justify the shortage. No one touches about the blatant monopoly by all those stinking rajas - raja gula, raja tepung, raja AP, all those criminals.

Wake up, economists!

Related:
Musa, mobilise your force....or get the fuck out of our face (Cik Gu Bernard)
Seen This Man? (Nuraina A Samad)
Nurin Alert For Nini.. (Nuraina A Samad)
Shahrizat: Everyone must help to find Sharlinie (The Star)
“We cannot waste any time, we must find this child. Not only to save her life, but also to send a clear message to the perpetrators – don’t think that in this country, you can do whatever crime or violent act you like”.
News about Sharlinie
Bloggers on Sharlinie
Don't use crime rate as poll gimmick (Malaysiakini)
Internal conflicts drive offenders to repeat crime, says psychologist (Bernama)
Lets Trade (Nazir Khan)
Please people of neighbouring countries, return our cooking oil, our, flour, our diesel and our young girls and take our leaders in return. They are the best in the world, please take them.
Pampered lives and price hikes (The Star)
Our politicians have preferred to downplay the escalating cost of living while trying to convince the people on the need to reduce subsidies. But the fact is, you cannot do both at the same time.

Sooner or later, we have to bite the bullet and face the reality of sharing the burden of subsidies. Elections or not, the Government will have to deal with the impact of oil price increases.

At the same time, the Government needs to work harder to stop wastage in projects that bring little benefit to Malaysians. Pride is one thing but if it serves little besides inflating our egos, then we should just save our money.

We also need to contain our cost of production and be serious in fighting corruption and mismanagement.

The campaign to convince Malaysians to be prudent and thrifty can only work if the Government also ends some of these abuses.

Sunday, January 6, 2008

They lit off candles of the oppressed


Courtesy of Malaysiakini

No matter what had happened, anti-ISA candlelight vigil at Dataran Merdeka last night was a success. It was truly overwhelming because less and less concerned citizens are afraid of the oppressors.

PAS Youth Chief, Salahuddin Ayub told me, “Look! People are not afraid of the police. They are here despite all the warning and barricades”.

They can lit off the candles of the oppressed with their water canon, but can they lit off the spirit of the oppressed?

Image
Salahuddin, his wife, their younger son and other concerned citizens (Courtesy of Harakahdaily)

Related:
Anti-ISA vigil dispersed with water cannon (Malaysiakini)
Malaysian riot police break up rally to protest detention without trial law (IHT)
Malaysians seek scrapping of national security act (PTI)
Malaysian police use water cannon on candlelight protest (Channel NewsAsia)
Protesters in Malaysia hold candlelight vigil against ISA (The Hindu)
Candle-light vigil against ISA in Malaysia (The Hindu)
Malaysian police break up rights rally (TVNZ)
Cops forced to use water cannon to disperse protesters (The Star)
Police disperse illegal assembly on ISA (Bernama)
Police disperse illegal rally at Dataran (NST)
Anti-ISA candlelight vigil disrupted by police (Ronnie Liu)
Anti-ISA vigil dispersed with water cannon... (Kak Ton)
Water cannon to disperse anti ISA Movement crowd (ProMahathir)
More Water Cannon! (Mofie)
Sipa Press: Peaceful candlelight vigil for ISA detainees IV (Saidul A Shaari)
They Could Have Approve It -(Melvin Mah)

Friday, December 21, 2007

The unholy trinity

The Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Johari Baharum, made the decision to investigate the organised crime syndicate. Johari also made the decision to detain half a dozen or so leaders of this organised crime syndicate, which included the number two man, 'Tengku' Goh. Johari signed the order to send them to Simpang Renggam for detention or, in the case of 'Tengku' Goh, for Restricted Residence in Kelantan.

Active Image

From Malaysia Today with due respect to the author, Raja Petra Kamarudin

You may have heard of the unholy trinity of Putrajaya -- the father, the son, and the holy ghost. No, Jesus Christ does not live in Putrajaya, so abandon your plan of rushing there this Tuesday. The father we are talking about is Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, his son, Kamal, and his son-in-law, Khairy; whom some would rather place closer to the devil than a holy ghost. Even with the arrival of Gabriel, Khairy's son, the unholy trinity cannot receive the blessing of being transformed into a holy trinity.

While all eyes are focused on this 'First Family' unholy trinity, there is, however, another unholy trinity that has thus far remained unnoticed and has been quietly going about doing their evil deeds without any spotlight and fanfare on what they are doing. This is the unholy alliance of the Attorney-General (A-G), the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) and the head of the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA).

Let us take a step back for the benefit of those who have not been following developments in Malaysia Today to recap what has transpired thus far.

The Director of the Commercial Crime Division (CCD) is currently in Mekah performing his Haj. Even as he circumbulates the Ka'bah, the ACA is preparing a new round of charges in which to slap him with on his return home to Malaysia. It makes one wonder whether God really listens to your prayers in spite of you offering them in front of His 'house', as what Muslims believe the Ka'bah to be. Maybe God has chosen to maintain a policy of non-intervention, which will dovetail with the Muslim belief that God will not change your fate unless you take steps to change it yourself.

Yes, God will not do your job for you. You have to take pains to do that yourself. And if you step in front of a speeding bus and scream, “God, save me!”, you will be dead meat in seconds. Maybe this is what the Prophet Muhammad meant when he was reported as having said, “First you tie your camel, then you pray to God for the safety of your camel.” Malays should take cognizance of this philosophy. You are in control of your own destiny. God will not lift a finger to help you if you yourself refuse to take action. And going to Mekah to pray for help in front of God's 'house' will not prevent the ACA from pressing more charges against you when you return home to Malaysia after performing your Haj.

Awhile back, some 'unknown' sources leaked to the media information that the CCD Director was being investigated for not declaring RM27 million in assets. Take note of this. He was not being investigated for amassing RM27 million in assets. He was being investigated for not declaring these assets. In short, it is not a crime for a police officer acquiring RM27 million in assets. It is only a crime if he does not fill in this little form declaring those assets. They don't care a damn how you acquired those assets. They care only if you don't fill in this form declaring them. It is, therefore, a mere 'technical' offence.

But when this CCD Director was finally charged, it was not for either acquiring or failing to declare RM27 million in assets. It was for 'abusing' his authority by flying over the Sabah jungles in a police aeroplane. Yes, the man who was then the Commissioner of Police for Sabah and who drives around town with a flag on the bonnet of his car is going to be sent to jail for flying in a plane that in the first place was under his jurisdiction. If that is a crime then the entire government would be in jail for driving or flying in a government-owned asset. And some like the Cabinet members, which include the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, even bring their family, friends, business acquaintances and girlfriends along for the joyrides. And we, the taxpayers, are paying for all this.

What is the real issue here? Is it that the CCD Director abused his authority by using a police plane? Is it that he acquired RM27 million in assets and did not declare them? No, none of the above, so read on.

The CCD Director challenged the allegation of failing to declare his assets. He enlisted the help of a lawyer to prepare his defence. He enlisted the help of a firm of accountants to audit his income and expenditure and to prepare a detailed statement of accounts the thickness of an Encyclopaedia Britannica of his financial affairs for 37 years from 1970 to 2007. The lawyer prepared his defence, and with the detailed statement of accounts as evidence, demolished the entire allegation and ripped the charge of failing to declare assets to shreds.

It was a superb piece of defence and the CCD Director was elated that the government had no case against him and that his lawyer and accountants had been able to rebut every allegation down to the last ten cents. Then the ACA made a surprise visit to the lawyer's office a day before Hari Raya and arrested him, and you will not believe this, for also failing to declare his assets. That's right, the lawyer who had superbly prepared the CCD Director's defence that would now see the latter off the hook was himself arrested by the ACA. The target of the investigation, the CCD Director, was not even under arrest yet. The investigation was not yet complete. But his lawyer was arrested and had to spend the night in the ACA lock-up in Putrajaya for 'failing to declare his assets'.

It had nothing to do with the crime of failing to declare assets. It was far from the crime of illegally acquiring assets, which was not even the brunt of the investigation. It was because the CCD Director had arrested the number two of the organised crime syndicate that has just gone national and has its tentacles from South Malaysia all the way up to North Malaysia. Yes, the prostitution, drugs, loan sharking and illegal gambling syndicate had just gone national. And the number one of the syndicate, BK Tan, was alleged to be in partnership with the IGP himself. And the allegation was not based on rumours or idle talk. It was based on numerous Affidavits signed by senior police officers and two underworld figures who submitted sworn testimonies to the Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Johari Baharum.

Now, in case any of you may have forgotten, Johari was the man tasked with the job of sabotaging Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in last year's Umno Kubang Pasu division elections. The 500 or so delegates were each bribed RM200 to not vote for Mahathir. Four delegates subsequently made police reports and signed Affidavits testifying to this fact, which they lodged with the Umno headquarters when they filed their official complaints. The Umno headquarters, however, said that it had investigated the matter and found no evidence to support the allegation. One of the complainants was later beaten up by some 'bouncers' from the Umno Kubang Pasu division. He of course personally know these Umno people who beat him up in his home in front of his family and he made another police report naming those who beat him up. But the police found no evidence of any assault and no charges were pressed against the Umno gangsters.

Based on the police investigation and the Affidavits signed by the many senior police officers and two underworld figures that a national organised crime syndicate does exist and that it has links all the way to the very top of the police force, Johari instructed the CCD Director to arrest Goh Cheng Poh a.k.a 'Tengku' Goh, the number two in the syndicate, and banish him to Kelantan under Restricted Residence Order. They then started investigating 'Tengku' Goh's boss, BK Tan, with a view that he too would be put out of circulation. A few other second-liner syndicate bosses from Johor were also arrested under the Emergency Ordinance and detained without trial in the Simpang Renggam detention centre. Last week, they were all released by order of the A-G as what we reported in the previous episode of The Corridors of Power, All that crap (read the article here). Action was also taken against all those police officers involved in investigating the organised crime syndicate. Some were arrested and detained overnight in the lock-up. Some were charged for various offences of abuse of power. And one was found dead in his car due to a gunshot wound which until today the police has never explained what happened.

See the following reports on the matter:

1. Malaysia’s organised crime syndicate: all roads lead to Putrajaya
2.
The roaches are scurrying and the rats are hurrying
3.
Please, IGP, explain this!
4.
The latest update on Infohub Sdn Bhd
5.
The walls come crumbling down
6.
No peace on Peace Hill
7.
Who’s running the asylum anyway?
8.
Blow away the whistle-blower
9.
Nothing but a den of thieves
10.
The land of Walt Disney
11.
I rather make the ACA a respected agency than a feared one

The Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Johari Baharum, made the decision to investigate the organised crime syndicate. Johari also made the decision to detain half a dozen or so leaders of this organised crime syndicate, which included the number two man, 'Tengku' Goh. Johari signed the order to send them to Simpang Renggam for detention or, in the case of 'Tengku' Goh, for Restricted Residence in Kelantan. And the dozen or so police officers, including the CCD Director, merely carried out the Deputy Minister's order. But when the dozen or so police officers were arrested, Johari kept silent. And when the A-G sent him a letter ordering him to release 'Tengku' Goh, he complied in spite of the evidence proving that all these people were guilty as hell and that the police were just doing what they had been ordered to do.

The issue here is actually quite simple and you do not have to be a genius to figure it out. Johari was at war with the IGP. The IGP was eliminating the underworld figures aligned to him (Johari). In fact, three of these underworld figures had earlier been detained and sent to Simpang Renggam for detention without trial. Johari was alleged to have released them and he was further alleged to have received RM5.5 million in bribes as inducement for releasing them. But no one knew about this until a mysterious website suddenly appeared that revealed this matter of the three detainees being released and the matter of the RM5.5 million bribe. The ACA immediately launched an investigation and it appeared like Johari was about to suffer a big-time fall from power.

Johari hit back. He threatened to reveal that Abdullah and the Umno Supreme Council had instructed him to sabotage Mahathir in last year's Umno Kubang Pasu division meeting. This is a breach of the party's Constitution as well as the party's Code of Ethics. The entire Supreme Council will have to resign, Abdullah included, if this matter became public knowledge. It in fact was already public knowledge as Malaysia Today had already exposed this matter in this same column in an article called Dolahgate (read the article here). But thus far no one had come forward to testify to this and now Johari was threatening to do so.

A deal was struck. The ACA will declare that it had investigated the allegation against Johari and that there is no evidence he had received the RM5.5 million bribe. Johari would then maintain his silence and not put Abdullah and the entire Umno Supreme Council in jeopardy. But Johari was still not satisfied. He got the CCD Director to investigate the parties behind that website alleging he had released three underworld figures aligned to him for a bribe of RM5.5 million. The trail led to the door of the Director of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID), Christopher Wan. Johari was outraged. It was an inside job. Christopher is the IGP's running dog. Therefore, thought Johari, the IGP must have been the one who fixed him up. Johari wanted to strike back and he ordered the CCD Director to move in on the underworld figures aligned to the IGP. And that was why these various underworld personalities were rounded up -- not to clean up the streets and eliminate the prostitution, drugs, loan sharking and illegal gambling syndicate, but to put the IGP's men out of business.

But the IGP had something which Johari did not have. The IGP was in cahoots with the ACA Director and the A-G. It was three against one. And the Prime Minister, who is also the Minister of Internal Security and therefore Johari's boss, needed the IGP, ACA, and A-G more than he needed Johari. So Johari will have to take the fall. But Johari is smart. He is, after all, a politician. He quickly made a deal and abandoned the police officers and allowed them to take the fall instead. Well, if he can sabotage his ex-boss, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who brought him up from a mere schoolteacher to where he is today, then what are a dozen police officers by comparison? So those who carried out the order will be going to jail while he who gave the order is sitting pretty. This should serve as a lesson to all civil servants, including the police force. Never do the bidding of the politicians because when the chips are down you will be left holding the baby.

The six pages of the Affidavit signed by Johari below tell the whole story, so we really do not need to explain it again in detail.. Suffice to say, the order to break the organised crime syndicate and arrest its leaders came from Johari. Item 32 of the Affidavit states that 'Tengku' Goh actually confessed to his crime. Item 8 of the Affidavit states that on 12 March 2007 Johari gave the order to launch the investigation. Johari further admits in item 14 that on 5 July 2007 he signed the warrant of arrest. But it is the police officers and the lawyer who will be going to jail, not Johari.

And where does Abdullah Ahmad Badawi come in on all this? Abdullah's hands are tied. He had earlier ordered the IGP to detain BSA Tahir under Section 8 of the Internal Security Act. If the police had detained him under Section 73, then the Special Branch would have him for 60 days. And once they have him they can interrogate him and find out who else is behind Scomi's export of nuclear components to Libya. This would be dangerous as Scomi belongs to Abdullah's son, Kamal, and once the interrogation reveals that Kamal knew all along what was going on and that he is not an unwitting party to the whole thing as they say he is, then the United States will want Kamal's head on a silver platter.

So Tahir was detained under Section 8 of the Internal Security Act which is signed by Abdullah himself and not by the police. Section 8 is the Minister's prerogative, not the police's who can only detain you under Section 73. And this is exactly what happened to the HINDRAF 5 as reported in the previous episode of The Corridors of Power, All that crap (read the article here). But an even more interesting question is not why was Tahir detained under Section 8 instead of Section 73 of the Internal Security Act which will allow the Special Branch to investigate who else are behind the Scomi centrifuge scandal? What is more important is where is Tahir now? He is supposed to have been detained under the Internal Security Act, which means he is in the Kamunting Detention Centre. But is he there? And if he is not there then where is he?

Yes, that is an even more important question than the question of why he was detained under Section 8 instead of Section 73 of the Internal Security Act. Tahir is not under detention. Tahir is under protective custody. He is under protective custody so that the Malaysian Special Branch and the American CIA can't get their hands on him. And Abdullah has the power to do this as he did for the HINDRAF 5 whom the Special Branch are also dying to get their hands on but can't.

Abdullah is not entirely in control though. The IGP, A-G and ACA chief have their own unholy trinity. And they will serve Abdullah just as long as Abdullah does not step on their toes. The Dolahgate affair, the Scomi centrifuge affair, and the Oil-for-Food affair are enough to put Abdullah away for a long time. But that will only happen if the IGP, A-G and ACA decide to launch a case against him. And it appears like at the moment 'got no case lah'. So Johari is on his own in his war with the IGP. And the two rival organised crime syndicates will have to fight it out in the turf war for control of the prostitution, drugs, loan sharking and illegal gambling rackets. And the way it is currently going, the IGP's side will win because Johari has backed off and has allowed the dozen or so police officers to become the sacrificial lambs.

Yes, not only goats, sheep, cows and camels are being sacrificed this Hari Raya Haji. Police officers too are being sacrificed. I shed no tears for police who detain Malaysians without trial and beat up detainees under custody. I also shed no tears for police who serve the political masters instead of the rakyat who are paying their salaries. But I have to admit I do pity these police officers who were used in the organised crime syndicate turf war between the Deputy Minister of Internal Security and the IGP and will all soon go to jail for the crime of 'saya hanya menjalankan arahan'. The next time a police officer gives me that famous and often-used line, I am going to laugh loudly in his face and remind him of what happened to the CCD Director and the dozen or so others when they hanya menjalankan arahan.The Deputy Minister of Internal Security, Johari Baharum, made the decision to investigate the organised crime syndicate. Johari also made the decision to detain half a dozen or so leaders of this organised crime syndicate, which included the number two man, 'Tengku' Goh. Johari signed the order to send them to Simpang Renggam for detention or, in the case of 'Tengku' Goh, for Restricted Residence in Kelantan. And the dozen or so police officers, including the CCD Director, merely carried out the Deputy Minister's order. But when the dozen or so police officers were arrested, Johari kept silent. And when the A-G sent him a letter ordering him to release 'Tengku' Goh, he complied in spite of the evidence proving that all these people were guilty as hell and that the police were just doing what they had been ordered to do.

The issue here is actually quite simple and you do not have to be a genius to figure it out. Johari was at war with the IGP. The IGP was eliminating the underworld figures aligned to him (Johari). In fact, three of these underworld figures had earlier been detained and sent to Simpang Renggam for detention without trial. Johari was alleged to have released them and he was further alleged to have received RM5.5 million in bribes as inducement for releasing them. But no one knew about this until a mysterious website suddenly appeared that revealed this matter of the three detainees being released and the matter of the RM5.5 million bribe. The ACA immediately launched an investigation and it appeared like Johari was about to suffer a big-time fall from power.

Johari hit back. He threatened to reveal that Abdullah and the Umno Supreme Council had instructed him to sabotage Mahathir in last year's Umno Kubang Pasu division meeting. This is a breach of the party's Constitution as well as the party's Code of Ethics. The entire Supreme Council will have to resign, Abdullah included, if this matter became public knowledge. It in fact was already public knowledge as Malaysia Today had already exposed this matter in this same column in an article called Dolahgate (read the article here). But thus far no one had come forward to testify to this and now Johari was threatening to do so.

A deal was struck. The ACA will declare that it had investigated the allegation against Johari and that there is no evidence he had received the RM5.5 million bribe. Johari would then maintain his silence and not put Abdullah and the entire Umno Supreme Council in jeopardy. But Johari was still not satisfied. He got the CCD Director to investigate the parties behind that website alleging he had released three underworld figures aligned to him for a bribe of RM5.5 million. The trail led to the door of the Director of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID), Christopher Wan. Johari was outraged. It was an inside job. Christopher is the IGP's running dog. Therefore, thought Johari, the IGP must have been the one who fixed him up. Johari wanted to strike back and he ordered the CCD Director to move in on the underworld figures aligned to the IGP. And that was why these various underworld personalities were rounded up -- not to clean up the streets and eliminate the prostitution, drugs, loan sharking and illegal gambling syndicate, but to put the IGP's men out of business.

But the IGP had something which Johari did not have. The IGP was in cahoots with the ACA Director and the A-G. It was three against one. And the Prime Minister, who is also the Minister of Internal Security and therefore Johari's boss, needed the IGP, ACA, and A-G more than he needed Johari. So Johari will have to take the fall. But Johari is smart. He is, after all, a politician. He quickly made a deal and abandoned the police officers and allowed them to take the fall instead. Well, if he can sabotage his ex-boss, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who brought him up from a mere schoolteacher to where he is today, then what are a dozen police officers by comparison? So those who carried out the order will be going to jail while he who gave the order is sitting pretty. This should serve as a lesson to all civil servants, including the police force. Never do the bidding of the politicians because when the chips are down you will be left holding the baby.

The six pages of the Affidavit signed by Johari below tell the whole story, so we really do not need to explain it again in detail.. Suffice to say, the order to break the organised crime syndicate and arrest its leaders came from Johari. Item 32 of the Affidavit states that 'Tengku' Goh actually confessed to his crime. Item 8 of the Affidavit states that on 12 March 2007 Johari gave the order to launch the investigation. Johari further admits in item 14 that on 5 July 2007 he signed the warrant of arrest. But it is the police officers and the lawyer who will be going to jail, not Johari.

And where does Abdullah Ahmad Badawi come in on all this? Abdullah's hands are tied. He had earlier ordered the IGP to detain BSA Tahir under Section 8 of the Internal Security Act. If the police had detained him under Section 73, then the Special Branch would have him for 60 days. And once they have him they can interrogate him and find out who else is behind Scomi's export of nuclear components to Libya. This would be dangerous as Scomi belongs to Abdullah's son, Kamal, and once the interrogation reveals that Kamal knew all along what was going on and that he is not an unwitting party to the whole thing as they say he is, then the United States will want Kamal's head on a silver platter.

So Tahir was detained under Section 8 of the Internal Security Act which is signed by Abdullah himself and not by the police. Section 8 is the Minister's prerogative, not the police's who can only detain you under Section 73. And this is exactly what happened to the HINDRAF 5 as reported in the previous episode of The Corridors of Power, All that crap (read the article here). But an even more interesting question is not why was Tahir detained under Section 8 instead of Section 73 of the Internal Security Act which will allow the Special Branch to investigate who else are behind the Scomi centrifuge scandal? What is more important is where is Tahir now? He is supposed to have been detained under the Internal Security Act, which means he is in the Kamunting Detention Centre. But is he there? And if he is not there then where is he?

Yes, that is an even more important question than the question of why he was detained under Section 8 instead of Section 73 of the Internal Security Act. Tahir is not under detention. Tahir is under protective custody. He is under protective custody so that the Malaysian Special Branch and the American CIA can't get their hands on him. And Abdullah has the power to do this as he did for the HINDRAF 5 whom the Special Branch are also dying to get their hands on but can't.

Abdullah is not entirely in control though. The IGP, A-G and ACA chief have their own unholy trinity. And they will serve Abdullah just as long as Abdullah does not step on their toes. The Dolahgate affair, the Scomi centrifuge affair, and the Oil-for-Food affair are enough to put Abdullah away for a long time. But that will only happen if the IGP, A-G and ACA decide to launch a case against him. And it appears like at the moment 'got no case lah'. So Johari is on his own in his war with the IGP. And the two rival organised crime syndicates will have to fight it out in the turf war for control of the prostitution, drugs, loan sharking and illegal gambling rackets. And the way it is currently going, the IGP's side will win because Johari has backed off and has allowed the dozen or so police officers to become the sacrificial lambs.

Yes, not only goats, sheep, cows and camels are being sacrificed this Hari Raya Haji. Police officers too are being sacrificed. I shed no tears for police who detain Malaysians without trial and beat up detainees under custody. I also shed no tears for police who serve the political masters instead of the rakyat who are paying their salaries. But I have to admit I do pity these police officers who were used in the organised crime syndicate turf war between the Deputy Minister of Internal Security and the IGP and will all soon go to jail for the crime of 'saya hanya menjalankan arahan'. The next time a police officer gives me that famous and often-used line, I am going to laugh loudly in his face and remind him of what happened to the CCD Director and the dozen or so others when they hanya menjalankan arahan.

Friday, December 14, 2007

Malaysian activists held under security law

AFP (13/12/2007): Malaysia said Thursday it has arrested five leaders of ethnic Indian rights group Hindraf under controversial security laws that allow for detention without trial.

Hindraf enraged the government last month by mounting a mass rally alleging discrimination against minority ethnic Indians in Malaysia, which is dominated by Muslim Malays.

Police used tear gas, water cannons and baton charges to break up the street protest which drew 8,000 people, and came just two weeks after another rare demonstration organised by electoral reform campaigners.

Deputy Internal Security Minister Mohd Johari Baharom confirmed the five were held under the Internal Security Act (ISA), which human rights groups are campaigning to have abolished.

"They can be held for two years for sedition and also for carrying out activities that threaten national security," he told the state Bernama news agency.

A Hindraf spokesman said the arrests of P. Uthayakumar, M. Manoharan, R. Kenghadharan, V. Ganabatirau and T. Vasanthakumar would not silence the movement, which the government has accused of stirring up racial tension.

"Regardless of the arrests this struggle will move on. We have many leaders who are waiting to take over and we will not go backwards but move ahead with the fight for the rights of Indians in Malaysia," S. Jayathas told AFP.

The ISA is currently being used to hold more than 100 people, including about 80 alleged Islamic militants.

It is not thought to have been used against government critics since 2001, when Malaysia was under the iron grip of former premier Mahathir Mohamad who used it to quell a reform movement triggered by the arrest of his deputy Anwar Ibrahim.

Opposition leader Lim Kit Siang condemned the government's move and said that if the Hindraf leaders had committed any offence they should be charged and tried in an open court.

"It is deplorable, the use of the ISA is completely indefensible," he told AFP.

"To resort to detention without trial is a regression to the dark days of human rights violations and is something that will bring further shame to Malaysia's international image and reputation."

Three of the Hindraf leaders have already been charged with sedition for speeches in which they criticised preferential treatment for Muslim Malays who make up 60 percent of the population and control the government.

Malaysia is also home to ethnic Chinese, who make up 26 percent of the population and dominate business.

Ethnic Indians, who make up 8.0 percent, complain they run a distant third in terms of wealth, opportunities and education.

Abdullah has for several weeks been threatening to invoke the draconian legislation against Hindraf, which authorities have accused of having links with Sri Lanka's Tamil Tigers. The group denies the charges.

Malaysia's ethnic Indians are mostly Tamils -- the descendents of indentured labourers brought here by the British in the 1800s.

Lawyers and human rights group have warned that the use of the ISA will only inflame the protest movement, which is airing grievances that have been bottled up for many years.

Malik Imtiaz Sarwar from the National Human Rights Society (Hakam) said the government's move was regrettable and unnecessary.

"The ISA detention will have the unfortunate effect of now stopping genuine attempts on the part of the marginalised Indian community to have their grievances addressed," he told AFP.

The legislation -- which dates back to the British colonial era when it was used against communist insurgents -- provides for two-year detention periods that can be renewed indefinitely.

Malik Imtiaz said that the opposition figures detained during the "Reformasi" movement of Anwar Ibrahim were mostly held for about two years before being released.

Related:
Malaysia arrests ethnic Indians - BBC News
Malaysia to launch signature drive - NDTV.com
Activists Held Under Strict Security Law - The Associated Press

Five facts on Malaysia's Internal Security Act

Reuters (13/12/2007): Malaysia has invoked its notorious Internal Security Act (ISA) to detain five ethnic Indians from a group that staged a mass anti-government protest last month.

There are currently 74 people, mostly suspected Muslim militants, being detained under the ISA, the government said last month.

Here are five facts on the ISA.

- Passed in 1960, three years after Malaysian independence, the ISA was designed to curb a perceived communist threat. It grew out of emergency regulations that were part of then Malaya's campaign against the Malayan Communist Party in British colonial times. Neighbour Singapore, once part of Malaysia, kept the ISA after leaving the Malaysian Federation in 1965.

- The act allows for the arrest and detention for an indefinite period of a suspect judged as "likely" to commit an act deemed dangerous to national security. Detainees can be held for 60 days without legal counsel, and preventive detention can then be renewed every two years.

- Amended dozens of times, it also has provisions to restrict freedom of assembly, expression and movement, among others. Since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on U.S. cities, it has been used to lock up dozens of suspected Islamic militants. Most ISA detainees are kept at Kamunting prison in northwest Perak state.

- The Human Rights Watch has said governments have consistently used the ISA for their own political purposes to detain thousands of citizens, including political opposition leaders, academics, trade unionists as well as religious, social, environmental and women's rights activists. Rights groups criticise the ISA as a draconian violation of international human rights standards, and a tool to stifle peaceful political dissent.

- In October 2007, opposition figure Abdul Malek Hussin became the first person to win a significant payment for illegal detention under the ISA. He was awarded nearly $750,000 in damages for his Sept 1998 detention, for addressing a "Reformasi" demonstration calling for political reform.

Monday, December 10, 2007

Malaysia's leader says public freedoms can be sacrificed for stability's sake

IHT (10/12/2007): Malaysia's leader said Monday he is willing to sacrifice public freedoms for the sake of national stability, a day after police arrested 21 opposition members and lawyers who took part in street protests.

Human rights activists have accused authorities of clamping down on freedom of expression by banning recent rallies aimed at calling for electoral reforms, government transparency and racial equality.

However, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said that efforts to ensure Malaysia's security demand "a sense of accountability to the whole, rather than the few."

"If the choice is between public safety and public freedoms, I do not hesitate to say here that public safety will always win," Abdullah said in a speech to corporate leaders.

"I will not sacrifice my sense of accountability to the greater public, especially in the face of police intelligence about planned fighting or other violent intent," Abdullah said. "We must never ever take our peace for granted."

Abdullah's administration has been rocked by a Nov. 10 rally in Kuala Lumpur — which drew some 30,000 people demanding electoral fairness ahead of national polls widely expected early next year — followed by a similarly large protest by minority ethnic Indians on Nov. 25 to complain of racial discrimination and economic deprivation.

Police arrested 12 members of an opposition coalition Sunday for taking part in the Nov. 10 rally, as well as nine people, including several lawyers, involved in a march for human rights earlier Sunday. Most of the lawyers were charged with illegal assembly Monday.

The government has also charged 31 Indians with attempted murder after a policeman was injured at the Nov. 25 rally.

Authorities had banned all the gatherings, saying they could threaten public order.

Abdullah pledged Monday to work to ensure political and economic justice, but added that people must remember "there are many groups within the country — each with their own sets of demands, each with their own set of sensitivities."

"These differences are very real, yet we do not descend into sheer unmitigated chaos," he said.

Abdullah also urged voters not to be swayed by groups that stir racial sentiments to reap political support.

"If voters are easily persuaded ... by people playing the racial card, then we are heading for disaster," he said.

Ethnic Malay Muslims, who comprise some 60 percent of Malaysia's 27 million people, control political power. Many ethnic Chinese and Indians, who form the two main minority communities, complain their grievances are ignored, especially regarding an affirmative action program that gives privileges to Malays in business, jobs and education. (AP)

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Hopefuly this is not true

Polices attack and Malays gangs attack
Courtesy of Malay Women in Malaysia

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Police reject Bersih's application for rally permit

Malaysiakini (7/11/2007): Poll watchdog Bersih has been denied permission to hold a massive public rally calling for electoral reforms at Dataran Merdeka this Saturday, said Deputy Internal Security Minister Johari Baharom today.

Bersih had applied for a permit on Nov 3 to hold the rally and based on a number of factors, the police refused to issue one. (Full report)

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Four lawyers file RM85 million suit against govt and police

Bernama (5/11/2007): Four lawyers filed a RM85 million suit against six police officers, including the Inspector-General of Police, and the government Monday for wrongful arrest and detention.

M.Manoharan, P.Uthayakumar, P.Waythamoorthy and V.Ganabatirau filed the suit at the Civil High Court registry through Messrs R.Kengadharan.

They named Shah Alam OCPD ACP Noor Azam Jamaludin, deputy OCPD Supt Sharif Abdul Wahid, the Inspector-General of Police, Selangor police chief, Selangor CID chief, one constable Hasrul and the government as defendants.

Manoharan, Uthayakumar and Ganabatirau are seeking RM20 million in general damages while Waythamoorthy is seeking RM25 million.

In their statement of claim, they said that they went to the Shah Alam district police headquarters on Oct 30 to see their respective clients but were stopped by constable Hasrul who acted aggressively and pushed Waythamoorthy, injuring him on the head and elbow.

They claimed that upon seeing the commotion, other policeen rushed to the station and constable Hasrul also used abusive language on them.

They were arrested at 11 that night on the instruction of the first five defendants and were only released at 8pm the following day.

They claimed that the wrongful arrest and detention had tarnished their reputation and image as lawyers.

They said that a result of the arrest, they did not get to meet their clients that day and also missed their other cases fixed for that day.

Monday, November 5, 2007

KL cops and judiciary getting a bad name

Straits Times Singapore (3/11/2007): the Malaysian government established a three-member panel last month to investigate a video clip that alleged judicial corruption, it sent out two separate messages.

First, Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi's administration acknowledged that widespread concerns over the independence of Malaysia's judiciary needed to be tackled urgently.

By setting up the independent panel, the government also tacitly admitted to a lack of public confidence in the ability of enforcement agencies, particularly the police, to carry out the simple task of determining the authenticity of the video clip.

The controversial clip, showing a senior lawyer allegedly brokering the appointment of judges, was released by the country's former deputy premier, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

This week, two separate events underscored the seriousness of the problems afflicting the judiciary and the police.

On Monday, Perak's Sultan Azlan Shah delivered a sharp rebuke to the country's judges when he told a conference of lawyers that the judiciary was in serious need of reform.

'Sadly, I must acknowledge there has been some disquiet about our judiciary,' said Sultan Azlan Shah, who at one time served as the country's chief judge. 'I am driven nostalgically to look back to a time when our judiciary was the pride of our region and our neighbours spoke admiringly of our legal service.'

A day later, Malaysia's third most senior police officer alleged that the country's two other main enforcement agencies - the Attorney-General's Chambers and the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) - were undermining police efforts to arrest criminals.

Datuk Ramli Yusoff, who heads the Commercial Crime Division, also accused the Attorney-General's Chambers and the ACA of harassing police informants over the detention of an alleged underworld warlord.

Datuk Ramli was charged in court on Thursday for failing to declare some of his assets.

To an outsider looking in, the picture is not pretty.

Datuk Ramli's claims, coupled with the caustic remarks that Sultan Azlan Shah made, present Datuk Seri Abdullah with the serious challenge of trying to convince the local and international business community that Malaysia is a safe investment destination.

Disquiet over Malaysia's judiciary and the country's enforcement agencies is not new.

The problems date back to 1988, when former premier Mahathir Mohamad clashed with the judiciary over several decisions by the courts that went against his administration.

Then the widely published trials of Datuk Seri Anwar in the late 1990s not only raised fresh questions over the judiciary, but also brought the enforcement agencies, particularly the police, under close scrutiny.

Analysts and businessmen said that the Anwar trials helped cement the perception that enforcement agencies and the judiciary were open to dictates by the ruling elite and even some politically powerful business groups.

'The perception remains, and all of these are the remnants of Dr Mahathir's rule,' said Prof Shamsul Amri Baharudin, a professor of social anthropology at Malaysia's National University. 'The message is clear: Abdullah needs to clean things up.'

Close associates of Datuk Seri Abdullah insisted that reforms were already under way.

They noted the recent anti-corruption crackdown on civil servants for alleged abuses in government procurement contracts and failure to disclose their assets, as in the case with Datuk Ramli.

'Allegations of victimisation by the ACA are signs that the virus is trying to fight back, and this shows that the clean-up is working,' said a senior government official.

But lawyers and opposition leaders say that Datuk Seri Abdullah's clean-up push is cursory at best and the political will to institute reforms is lacking.

This could be because of the workings of Malaysian politics.

Datuk Seri Abdullah's ruling United Malays National Organisation (Umno) draws most of its political support from the rural Malay heartland.

In this constituency, concerns over the judiciary and the country's security agencies do not resonate as strongly as they do among the country's urban population.

'There is no push factor for Umno to reform the judiciary or the police,' said a retired judge who asked not to be named.

But the reluctance to deal with growing unease with the judiciary and the enforcement agencies could have serious economic repercussions.

In his speech on Monday, Sultan Azlan Shah cited results of a recent World Bank survey on the resolution of commercial disputes, which gave Malaysia a poor ranking of 63 among 178 countries.

'A similar report by the US State Department warns American businessmen to be wary of the slow process of adjudication of cases before the Malaysian courts,' he said.

'This is indeed a poor reflection on our courts.'

CCID director Ramli claims trial to three charges

The Sun (1/11/2007): Federal Commercial Crimes Investigations Department director Datuk Ramli Yusuff today claimed trial to three charges - two for non-disclosure of assets and a third charge for involvement in business while being a public servant - in a sessions court here today.

On the first charge of non-disclosure of assets under Section 32(2) of the Anti-Corruption Act 1997, Ramli allegedly failed to declare the ownership of two lots of business suites in the Megan Avenue II building located on Jalan Yap Kwan Seng here.

The value of the two office units, during acquirement, was worth RM1, 032, 840 million and was held by two directors of Bonus Circle Sdn Bhd who were named as Ramli’s elder and younger sisters, Rohmah@ Hasmah Yusoff and Roslina respectively.

On the second charge, Ramli allegedly failed to declare the ownership of 154,000 units of shares in Permaju Industries Sdn Bhd.

The two offences were allegedly committed by Ramli at the ACA headquarters in Putrajaya on Sept 17, for failing to adhere to the written notice, under Setion 32(1)(a) of the Anti-Corruption Act, which requires him to declare in writing and under oath, on assets, movable or immovable, owned by him or which he had interest in and also, all sources of income.

The third, a summons charge, alleged that Ramli, on April 25, 2006, being a public servant, a Commissioner of Police holding the position of the director of the Commercial Crimes Investigations Department in Bukit Aman had flouted the Regulation 5(1)(a) of the Public Servants Rules and Regulations (Amendment) 2002 which prohibited him from being involved in business.

He was alleged to have taken part in business by being involved in Kinsajaya Sdn Bhd as a director of the company, and had thus committed an offence under Section 168 of the Penal Code.

After the first two charges were read to him by the court interpreter, Ramli claimed trial.

ACA Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Mohd Jazamuddin Ahmad Nawawi told judge S.M.Komathy Suppiah the prosecution would be calling 20 witnesses and requested for one-week for the trial to kick-off.

He said since the offences were bailable, they had no objections to allow Ramli to go overseas to perform "umrah" but requested that he hand over his passport once he returns.

Ramli’s lawyer, Datuk K.Kumaraendran appealed for Ramli’s passport not to be impounded by the court.

"He is the third highest ranking police, the director of the Commercial Crimes Investigations Department and has been in the force for 38 years. His entire career hangs in jeopardy because of these charges.

" It has cast a shadow on his character as a senior police officer. (The) accused intends to restore his good name and this is sufficient reason for him to appear in court and clear his name," Kumarendran told the court.

He objected to the application for Ramli’s passport to be surrendered to the court, saying such a move was additional security for someone who might abscond, and there was no evidence to suggest that Ramli is about to flee the charge.

Kumaraendran said being a senior police officer, there was no chance of Ramli absconding and appealed for the court to allow Ramli to stand on his personal bond to attend the hearing. He added that Ramli, who is about to perform the "umrah" overseas was also scheduled to accompany the Sultan of Kelantan in the pilgrimage.

Mohd Jazamuddin said Ramli should be no different from any other man-on-the-street and the application for his passport to be impounded by the court applies to everyone else.

He said the prosecution had no objection to Ramli being allowed to perform the "umrah" but once he returns the passport has to be surrendered to the court.

Kumaraendran argued that Ramli had been very cooperative with the ACA and had gone to their headquarters after being told to for his statement to be recorded, only to be charged instead.

He applied for Ramli to be released on his personal bond, but Komathy rejected the application.

"Datuk Ramli, you can keep your passport," said Komathy before setting bail at RM20,000 and fixing Jan 15 to 18 for the case to be heard.

Ramli, who was in the dock when the two charges were read out to him, then stepped out when the summons charge was read to him and claimed trial.

Mohd Jazamuddin said the prosecution will be calling 15 witnesses and asked for an early date.

Kumaraendran said he had to look at the charge in detail as he was not privy to some of the details earlier and that his defence team might seek a joint-trial date for the three charges.

Jazamuddin said they were not looking at a joint-trial but agreed for the third charge to be mentioned on the dates fixed earlier, on Jan 15.

Also present in court today were Ramli’s wife, sessions court 3 judge Datuk Anita Harun and lawyer Rosli Dahlan who was recently charged in court for failing to declare his assets in connection with the investigations into Ramli by the ACA.

It is learnt Rosli had attempted to represent Ramli but had to disqualify himself from doing so by the ACA.

Besides Anita and Roslan, others believed to be Ramli’s sisters and relatives, friends and police officers in plain clothes were in court to lend moral support to Ramli.

Kumaraendran was assisted by Datuk C. Vijaya Kumar and Harvinderjit Singh while Zulkarnain Hassan assisted Mohd Jazamuddin.

Ramli’s bail was posted by a friend, businessman Datuk Roger Tan.

Whistle-blowing blown to bits

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Ramli also slams agency’s treatment of informants

The Star (31/10/2007): Federal Commercial Crime Investigations Department (CCID) director Comm Datuk Ramli Yusoff criticised the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA), Attorney-General and the police for the manner in which they investigated the “RM27mil cop” case.

Breaking his long silence on the controversy, he expressed concern over the way the ACA conducted its investigations against him and his officers, several of whom have been charged with falsifying witnesses’ statements.

“Within a week, several officers from the CCID were arrested and charged in court for allegedly falsifying evidence concerning the arrest and banishment of one Goh Cheng Poh @ Tunku.

“The CCID officers have been mistreated by the ACA and are yet to be protected by their own force. I hope the Internal Security Ministry will deal with the issues at hand,” he told a press conference at his office in Bukit Perdana yesterday.

Comm Ramli said the names of confidential informants were disclosed in the charge sheets by the ACA and he was concerned that the identities of police informants were being exposed.

He said given recent events, there exist a “clear and present danger” to the intelligence gathering ability of the force and its ability to protect its informants.

Recapping the events leading to the investigations, Comm Ramli said that some time last year a joint committee and special task force was established at Cabinet level and police to combat the Ah Long and illegal gambling menace.

“The Deputy Internal Security Minister gave specific directives to the CCID officers on the activities of certain crime syndicates operating in Johor involving certain Datuks and Justices of Peace (JPs).

“The CCID investigations led to the eventual arrest, detention and banishment of Goh to Jeli, Kelantan.

“The detention and banishment order was signed by the Deputy Internal Security Minister based on the intelligence gathered by the CCID,” said Comm Ramli, who named the deputy minister as Datuk Johari Baharom.

Comm Ramli said Goh, who had also been banished previously, was also allegedly involved in a shooting incident in which a friend was shot and killed.

Soon after the second banishment order, the press reported that the ACA and Criminal Investigations Department (CID) had already investigated and cleared Goh of any wrongdoing. Comm Ramli said they had not taken into account the CCID’s investigations.

“Goh then applied to the High Court to set aside the banishment order.

“In an unprecedented stance, the legal adviser of the ministry and an officer of the AG’s Chambers declined to advise us and directed that my officers and I prepare affidavits of the events for the benefit of the Deputy Internal Security Minister,” he said.

Comm Ramli said given the time constraints, he and his officers sought legal advice from a private law firm who helped draw up the draft affidavits.

He said he and his officers were then directed to submit the confidential case files containing the names of the informants to the AG’s Chambers.

“I have since been made aware that the ACA officers have tracked down these informants and taken statements from them.

“Subsequently, these informants have made further statements seeking protection from the Deputy Minister,” he said.

Johari, when contacted last night, confirmed that he had directed the CCID to investigate the crime syndicates operating in Johor.

“I did this as I received complaints from the public,” he added.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Malaysia charges senior cop with corruption

AOL (1/11/2007): Malaysia's top police official in busting white collar crimes on Thursday found himself charged by the Anti-Corruption Agency for failing to disclose his assets.

The Commercial Crimes Investigation Department head Ramli Yusof, 55, the third highest ranking officer in the force, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for not declaring two properties worth over a million ringgit (US$286,000) that were bought under his two sisters' names.

He was also charged for failing to disclose 154,000 units of shares he owned in a company. It was not revealed how much those shares are worth.

Ramli, whom the ACA noted as the most senior police officer ever to be charged under Anti-Corruption Act, was also accused of breaching government regulations by serving as a director in a private company while still in government service.

Violations of the act carry a jail term ranging between 14 days and 20 years, and maximum fine of 100,000 ringgit.

Ramli pleaded not guilty to all counts and was released on bail. His trial date was set for Jan. 15.

Ramli's court appearance came a day after he called a press conference to deny media reports that he had amassed 27 million ringgit worth of assets illegally. He claimed he has been victimized by the ACA and criticized his own police force for failing to protect him.

But behind Ramli's case are worrisome developments that threaten efforts to clean up the image of the police force already tainted with accusations of rampant corruption and brutality.

Former police chief Hanif Omar recently wrote in his regular column in the English-language daily Star that police corruption is "so extensive that a very senior ACA officer had confided in me and another top retired police officer that 40 percent of the senior officers could be arrested without further investigations --strictly on the basis of their lifestyles."

Corruption aside, Ramli's press conference laid bare the schism among the top guns of the men in blue.

The Star, in an editorial Thursday, suggested that rifts among members of the police force are due to current police chief Musa Hassan's efforts to clean up the agency.

"Many policemen have found it hard to deal with Musa. He has cracked the whip, declared war against graft and transferred certain senior officials," the newspaper said.

"Still the power play is somewhat scary, if not macabre to most Malaysians who have never witnessed such open tension within the police force. Maybe it's Halloween but the can of worms being opened is disturbing nevertheless." (AP)

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Stop police's power abuse and human rights must be protected

(Sin Chew Daily 22/10/2007)

“The behaviour of the defendants is inhumane, cruel and despicable, as the plaintiff (Abdul Malek Hussin) was not just arrested and detained unlawfully for 57 days but was also subjected to a vile assault, unspeakable humiliation, and prolonged physical and mental ill-treatment... The practice of torture of any kind is to be detested. The despicable conduct of the then Inspector General of Police, Tan Sri Rahim Noor, was shameful and a disgrace. He had shown an extremely bad example to the thousands of men under his charge.” Justice Hishamudin Mohd Yunus in his judgement 18 Oct 2007 Abdul Malek Hussin vs (Special Branch police officer ASP) Borhan Bin Hj Daud, the Inspector General of Police, and the Government of Malaysia.

Justice Hishamudin's decision to award RM2.5 million (US$740,000) in damages to the former Internal Security Act detainee is indeed a victory for judiciary. It shows the court has started to put right the abuse of power by the executive branch of the government. Detainees who had suffered under abouse s by the police can now seek justice.

The experience of the plaintiff, Abdul Malek reflected on the seriousness of the power abuse problem in police department. In 2005, a shocking “nude squat” video clip was shown to the public. The Malay lady later filed a lawsuit against the Malaysian government seeking compensation of RM250,000. The court has yet to decide on the case.

After the video clip was exposed, the government set up an independent panel to investigate the case. As the nude squatting procedurte (during police custody) has violated her human rights, the panel suggested the abolition of such police practices.
"These human rights abuses happened not only because the police department has not follow the procedures for detention and abuses their power, but the delay in hearing such court cases itself is a violation of the detainees’ human rights."
However, in September 2007, four police officers were found assaulting an Indonesian karate referee. It had nearly triggered a diplomatic crisis. The case was finally solved after Malaysia apologised. Nevertheless, rumours of ill-treatment by the police are still surfacing.

Although the government had taken disciplinary action against the police officers concerned, some still carry on their old ways and are brazenly involved in abuse of power and fraud. Therefore, complaints against the police are non-stop, and the victims could only seek justice through the judiciary.

When a police officer is involved in corruption or abuses his power, he would be given a verbal reprimand by his superiors. But some chose to ignore such warnings. They continue to abuse their power. The discipline and the reputation of the police department is thus eroded a little by little. This shows that verbal reprimand, demotion and suspension are insufficient as deterrents. Once the court has made a ruling on such cases of abuse of power, those involved should be investigated and charged in court.

Abdul Malek, the nude squat victim and others who have had their human rights must be given redress. When a person is detained for crime investigation, it does not mean he is no longer protected by law and the police can do whatever they want. The Federal Constitution guarantees basic protection to the detainees, including meeting with lawyers, family visits, medical treatment, adequate food supply and the like. As a law enforcement unit, the police department must have this knowledge and cannot violate the Constitution.

According to investigation reports by some human rights organisations, our human rights record has not made much progress. These human rights abuses happened not only because the police department has not follow the procedures for detention and abuses their power, but the delay in hearing such court cases itself is a violation of the detainees’ human rights.

Human rights in Parliament is always a concern of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM). SUHAKAM will start their investigations after they have received complaints. However, their previous recommendations have fallen on deaf ears of the police and the government.

As a human rights gatekeeper, SUHAKAM should enhance its power by getting more enforcement power to improve Malaysia's human rights and national image.

As for the police's power abuse, the best solution is to set up monitoring bodies, such as Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission. However, out of the 125 recommendations by Royal Commission on Royal Malaysian Police, only 101 recommendations have been accepted. Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission is amongst the 24 rejected recommendations.

I believe more complaints on police's power abuse will be forthcoming after Malek's court victory. The government must pay more attention on the establishment of an independent panel. It is with such an external watchdog that we can expect the police force to be efficient, professional and to be mindful of protecting human rights. (By CHONG LIP TECK)

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Ghani provides a chance to say everything is ok

Police willing to brief AG why suspects in Nurin murder probe released

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 16 (Bernama) -- The Police will brief Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail the reasons for the release of suspects detained in the Nurin murder probe if asked, said Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan.

"I myself will explain to him should he (AG) want to know the details," he told reporters after witnessing the handing over of duties ceremony for Bukit Aman's new logistics director here Tuesday.

He said this when asked to comment on a report in an English newspaper on Friday which said that the AG wanted an explanation why all the suspects detained in connection with the case were released.

Asked on the three men seen getting into a Perodua Kenari car that was recorded on the CCTV system of the shop where eight-year-old Nurin Jazlin Jazimin 's body was left in a sports bag, Musa said they had no links to the case.

The three men turned up at the Petaling Jaya police station on Friday to give statements after pictures taken from the video recording showing their presence at the crime scene were published in all the major newspapers.

On the investigations as to how autopsy pictures of Nurin's body could have been circulated on the Internet, Musa said, "We will get to the bottom of this barbaric act."

He declined to comment on the latest developments in the murder probe.

Nurin went missing on August 20 after going on her own to a night market near her house in Wangsa Maju here. On September 20, her naked body stuffed in a sports bag was found left underneath the staircase of shoplot in PJS1/48.

A total of five suspects including an Indonesian woman were detained in connection with case but all were later freed.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Firing of live bullets at opposition gathering

Blogs:

Achmed Rauff Khairy - FAM Deputy President?!!!

Ahirudin Attan Sixth day

Aisehman On The Ball

Amde Sidik True or not true?

Benny Loh Smoker-friendly Budget

Bergen Yusof's Family

Biggum Dogmannsteinberg Raja Petra urged the DAP to work with the Malays

Blogging and Blotting-Leo 10 held for rioting at Keadilan ceramah - 'CRIME BLITZ'

CJCM Police shot live bullets in Batu Buruk: Was it necessary?

Cyber Wap Reuters World: Malaysia police fire on opposition rioters

Elizabeth Wong Magic bullet

Fikri Malaysian police fire opposition gathering

Hsu Dar Ren New recording - myself playing ‘IF’

Jeff Ooi Shares drop on 1st trading day after Budget

K Temoc Shooting truth? - Truth shot?

Ken-Jin Lim Congratualtions

Lucia Lai Another cartoon crisis?

Mahendran News : Lawsuit against UK

Marina Mahathir Post-Op, Day 6

Mat Salo Malaysia The Arrogant



Multimid MORE PICS & Video – First SMART Tunnel Flood Diversion Successful? Why Upper decks were ALSO Closed? Play safe - possible disaster if walls Cracked?

Nathaniel Tan Postituted Star Covers-Up Vicious Police Violence

Nazir Khan Free Education, No Fees?

Nik Nazmi Tembakan di Terengganu

Nuraina A Samad Where are you, my beloved?

Ronnie Liu Batu Buruk Tragedy: It’s premeditated

S K Thew Kong Choy’s “resignation”

Salvatore Dali CEO Pay Excesses At Our Doorstep

Scamboy Telenor is meeting the Minister today

The Malaysian Hishammuddin Goes To Saudi Arabia To 'Learn' About Gifted Children Programmes

Tian Chua Melaka pig farmers

Tokasid There are two things that irrates me today

Tony Pua Budget 2008: Who Benefits? (II)

What A Lulu Lulu's Reading the Budget (4)

Wielmaja Proton Oh Proton - Part II

Y L Chong Some GEICs still believe in using typewriters!

Zewt Budget for you, spending for them

News:

Malaysian police fire tear gas to break up opposition gathering

No Plan To Abolish, Standardise Parent-Teacher Association Fee

Firing of live bullets at opposition gathering an unexpected Budget '08 bonus


Prohibition On Open Ceramah Unless During Election Campaign

Top three blogs

Listed by The Wayang Party Club of Singapore Malaysia Today
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad
Lim Kit Siang

English blogs

Multilingual

MPs, Aduns

2008 list

  © Blogger template 'Perfection' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP